We are inexcusable
What does man know about God in his natural state? Man is created in
God's image, and is given an eternal perspective to look beyond the
routine of his daily life (Ecclesiastes 3:11). He knows about God's
eternal power and divinity, through the realities around him of time,
space, and objects. His sinful nature continually reacts against the
evidence of God, and that is why man falls into idolatry, polytheism,
agnosticism, etc. In his sin, apostate man "suppress the
truth" and change the glory of the incorruptible God into an image:
witness the diversity of world-religions, which, while they witness to
man's religiosity, are a strong evidence of man's rebellion in
worshipping a man-made god, a god made in human likeness.
At the very least, all humans have an inkling within themselves that
there must be a supreme Being to whom they are accountable. But they
invariably smother and quench, as far as they can, the awareness that
this general revelation provides of the transcendent Judge and Creator.
They do have an ineradicable sense of deity, but they transfer it to
unworthy objects. However, God will not allow man to suppress entirely
his sense of God and of His judgment. Some sense of right and wrong,
plus the sense of accountability, always remain.
In his apologetic, "Basic Christianity", C.S.Lewis rightly
starts from this fundamental point: every man, from all cultures and
epochs, have a moral sense. When someone tries to cheat him, he cries
out, "That's unfair." Whence did he get this moral sense? Even
in the fallen world everyone is endowed with a conscience that from time
to time condemns them, telling them that they ought to suffer for wrongs
they have committed. Man will get rid of conscience if he can, for it
bugs him constantly, but he cannot, for it is God's reminder to man that
he is responsible and will ultimately give account. Man knows that God
is a moral God, but he cannot know him as Saviour. They know that
"he's there," but they hold this knowledge in guilt, with
uncomfortable inklings of the judgment they cannot avoid.
How might this knowledge be used in evangelising? True evangelism has
to start with the bad news first, as Paul did in Romans chapter 1-3.
Only against the backdrop of man's rebellion and disobedience can the
love of God and his gracious provision of redemption in Christ be
appreciated. Luther used to emphasise the two aspects of the Law and the
Gospel. The Law comes first. The Law makes the gospel both necessary and
desirable.
In evangelising, the Christian may be assured that his contact knows
already about God, though he has furnished himself with a thousand
excuses and aberrations. But the link is there, and he can and should
address him as a moral being, who stands condemned and guilty because he
has not used aright the innate sense of God he has within himself.
Though the person may deny his moral obligation, yet the Christian
must press him with the knowledge he already has. That's the starting
point.
Other issues may be taken up later. For instance, since God exists
and since God is a living God, then it is possible that God has spoken
to us. Thus the Scripture, as special revelation, is brought in.
|